AUC KINANTHROPOLOGICA
AUC KINANTHROPOLOGICA

Acta Universitatis Carolinae Kinanthropologica (AUC Kinanthropologica) is an international peer reviewed journal for the publication of research outcomes in the humanities, the social sciences and the natural sciences, as applied to kinathropology. It is a multidisciplinary journal accepting only original unpublished articles in English in the various sub-disciplines and related fields of kinanthropology, such as Anthropology, Anthropomotorics, Sports Pedagogy, Sociology of Sport, Philosophy of Sport, History of Sport, Physiology of Sport And Exercise, Physical Education, Applied Physical Education, Physiotherapy, Human Biomechanics, Psychology of Sport, Sports Training and Coaching, Sport Management, etc. The journal also welcomes interdisciplinary articles. The journal also includes reports of relevant activities and reviews of relevant publications.

The journal is abstracted and indexed by CNKI, DOAJ, EBSCO, ERIH PLUS, SPOLIT, SPORTDiscus, and Ulrichsweb.

AUC KINANTHROPOLOGICA, Vol 59 No 2 (2023), 79–92

The constitutive values of fair play

Miloš Bednář

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366052.2023.5
zveřejněno: 23. 01. 2024

Abstract

Fair play as a phenomenon of sporting life is present even if only in the form of small acts or gestures in most competitions; its absence is present in cases of foul play. The daily press comments its presence or absence every day in, and not only in the sports sections. Both the public and experts discuss acts from so called grey zone (forms of gamesmanship). Deciding unequivocally on the moral quality of a diverse range of actions, attitudes or statements requires clarity about the values underpinning fair play. Our aim is therefore to find the constitutive values of fair play by examining a set of values from the field of sport, rel¬evant offerings from fundamental ethics, using Abraham Maslow’s meta-value system and selection from the fundamental values of fair play considered so far. Organizing the selected values into a meaningful system is the final aim. We used a hermeneutic method to interpret the role of values within fair play. We identify five values and five meta-values as constitutive of fair play, the meta-values of goodness, truth, and transcendence as the basis of the entire system. We identify character (of athletes) and ethos (of sports communities) as both initiators of activities within the system and recipients of benefits.

klíčová slova: axiology; character; ethos; meta-values; sports ethics

reference (39)

1. Andreu-Cabrera, E. (2010). Olympic values: The end does not justify the means. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 5(1), 15-23. CrossRef

2. Anzenbacher, A. (1992). Einführung in die Ethik. Düsseldorf: Patmos Verlag.

3. Aristotle (1921). Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

4. Aristotle (1924). Poetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

5. Bednář, M. (2011). Education with Conscience: "Conscientia mille testes". In: J. Dovalil et al. (Eds.), Fair Play Education in Schools: A Shared Responsibility. The 16th European Fair Play Congress (pp. 114-118). Czech Olympic Committee.

6. Bednář, M. (2017). Catharsis in the biodromal perspective and with focus on sports and outdoor activities. Journal of Outdoor Activities, 11, 9-14.

7. Brand, M. (2006). The Role and Value of Intercollegiate Athletics in Universities. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 33, 9-20. CrossRef

8. Council of Europe (2010). The Code of Sports Ethics: Fair play - the winning way. https://rm.coe.int/16804cf400.

9. Crossan, W., & Bednář, M. (2018). A critical evaluation of the development and use of values in coaching. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Kinanthropologica, 54(2), 96-117. CrossRef

10. Doty, J. (2006). Sports build character?! Journal of College and Character, 7(3), 1-9. CrossRef

11. Gerdy, J. R. (2000). Sports in School: The Future of an Institution. Teachers College Press.

12. Gillmeister, H. (1993). Not Cricket und Fair Play: Betrachtungen zum Englischen Sportgedanken. In: V. Gerhardt & M. Lämmer (Eds.), Fairness und Fair Play (pp. 127-137). Sankt Augustin: Academia.

13. Housiaux, P. (2022). Presidentʼs Message: Fair Play - Spirit of Sport. www.fairplayeur.com/efpm/presidents-message/.

14. Howe, L. A. (2004). Gamesmanship. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 31(2), 212-225. CrossRef

15. International Fair Play Committee (2015). What is Fair Play? www.fairplayinternational.org/what-is-fair-play.

16. Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. In: T. Parsons, & E. Shils (Eds.), Toward a General Theory of Action (pp. 388-433). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. CrossRef

17. Kretchmar, S. R. (1994). Practical Philosophy of Sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

18. Kretchmar, S. R. (2005). Practical Philosophy of Sport and Physical Activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

19. Küng, H. (1990). Projekt Welt ethos. München: Piper Verlag.

20. Loland, S. (2002). Fair play in sport: a modern norm system. London: Routledge.

21. Loland, S., & McNamee, M. (2000). Fair Play and the Ethos of Sports: An Eclectic Philosophical Framework. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 27(1), 63-80. CrossRef

22. Marcel, G. (1998). Homo viator: Prolégomènes à une métaphysique de l' espérance. Association Présence de Gabriel Marcel.

23. Mareš, L. (2023). 'Good Sport': Different Dimensions and Their Constitutive Properties From the Ontological and Moral Point of View. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, 99(1), 27-42. CrossRef

24. Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers.

25. Maslow, A. (1964). Religions, Values, and Peak-Experiences. Columbus Ohio: Ohio State University Press.

26. Maslow, A. (1971). The Farther Reaches of Human Nature. New York: Viking Press.

27. McIntosh, P. (1979). Fair play: ethics in sport and education. London: Heinemann.

28. McNamee, M. J., & Parry, S. J. (Eds.) (1998). Ethics and sport. New York: E & FN Spon.

29. Peterson, C. et al. (2007). Strengths of character, orientations to happiness, and life satisfaction. Journal of Positive Psychology, 2(3), 149-156. CrossRef

30. Plato (1989). The collective dialogues. E. Hamilton, & H. Cairns (Eds.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

31. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press. CrossRef

32. Renson, R. (2009). Fair Play: Its Origins and Meanings in Sport. Kinesiology, 41(1), 5-18. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/60493.

33. Sage, G. (1998). Does sport affect character development in athletes? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 69(1), 15-18. CrossRef

34. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45. CrossRef

35. Simon, R. L. (1985). Fair Play: Sports, Values, and Society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

36. Simon, R. L. (2010). Fair Play: The Ethics of Sport. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

37. Skoblík, J. (1997). Přehled křesťanské etiky (Overview of Christian Ethics). Praha: Karolinum.

38. Thompson, J. (2003). The Double-Goal Coach. HarperCollins.

39. World Anti-Doping Agency (2021, January 1). World Anti-Doping Code. https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/2021_wada_code.pdf.

Creative Commons License
The constitutive values of fair play is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

157 x 230 mm
vychází: 2 x ročně
cena tištěného čísla: 190 Kč
ISSN: 1212-1428
E-ISSN: 2336-6052

Ke stažení